Supreme Court Clarifies Conspiracy Statute of Limitations, Burden of Proof

Supreme Court Clarifies Conspiracy Statute of Limitations, Burden of Proof

In one of the first published decisions from the October session, the Supreme Court issued a short but interesting opinion concerning conspiracy charges. Typically, when a criminal defendant has been charged with conspiracy, the burden of proof falls to the prosecutor to show that there was, in fact, a conspiracy.

That said, the court answered a question in Smith v. United States as to who bears the burden of proof if the defendant demonstrates some proof as to their withdrawal from a conspiracy outside of the scope of the statute of limitations. The petitioner, Smith, argued that once some proof has been submitted to suggest that the defendant had withdrawn from the conspiracy, the burden shifted to the prosecution. The court, however, disagreed.

Justice Scalia, in writing for the court, stated "this position draws support neither from the Constitution (as discussed in this Part II), nor from the conspiracy and limitations statutes at issue…" He continued, "While the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which [the defendant] is charged,' In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358, 364 (1970), proof of the nonexistence of all affirmative defenses has never been constitutionally required.

Citations: Smith v. United States, No. 11–8976 (S. Ct. Jan. 9, 2013)

Dishman Military Advocates - Military Criminal Defense Lawyer
Located at PO Box 14495
Oklahoma City, OK .
View Map
Phone: (877) 521-9006
© 2017 All Rights Reserved.

When You're

Ready to talk

Our firm is ready to listen. Call for a FREE case consultation.

Call Toll-Free 877.521.9006
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.