Virignia District Court holds that prior NJP precludes Federal Court charges for same offense

Virignia District Court holds that prior NJP precludes Federal Court charges for same offense

The defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated aboard Marine Corps Base at Quantico, Virginia. The defendant, although having an absolute right to trial by court-martial, waived this right and accepted Article 15, or Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP). After judgment and sentencing, the defendant was charged with the drunken operation of a motor vehicle aboard a federal installation by the U.S. Attorney's Office. The question before the court was whether the defendant's subsequent charge in federal court was in violation of his Constitutional rights of due process. The court held that it was.

The court analogized the acceptance of NJP to a defendant's plea bargaining agreement, concluding, "…the court…could not further prosecute the defendant for the offenses described in [their] plea agreement." Here, the court concludes that "[t]he government's end of the non-judicial punishment agreement is rooted in Article 15, the JAG Manual, and the MOU. The regime created by those authorities contemplates that a service member who agrees to waive his right to trial by court-martial and accept Non-Judicial Punishment is foreclosing further prosecution. Indeed, the regime would not be rational otherwise."

Citations

United States v. Espinosa (E.D. Va Dec 2, 2010)

Dishman Military Advocates - Military Criminal Defense Lawyer
Located at PO Box 14495
Oklahoma City, OK .
View Map
Phone: (877) 521-9006
Website:
© 2017 All Rights Reserved.

When You're

Ready to talk

Our firm is ready to listen. Call for a FREE case consultation.

Call Toll-Free 877.521.9006
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.